NAM estimates 10+2 cost at $20 billion/year

June 26, 2009

The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) recently conducted a study on 10+2 and came up with some interesting findings, including:

  • ISF has been difficult and disruptive to respondents’ supply chains
  • Will likely increase operational costs by $3.5 billion annually
  • Will likely add an average of 2.8 days of delay to the import process, costing an estimated $17.2 billion a year
  • Total annual costs for ISF requirements are estimated at more than $20 billion
  • And this is just for manufacturers. I wonder what a study like this would find for retailers?  Regardless, CBP is still moving ahead so you best prepare now.

    You can see the report here.


    Three Approaches to 10+2 Compliance

    June 5, 2009

    As the air begins to clear and importers begin to get a better handle on how they’re going to comply with the 10+2 regulations from CBP, a few basic approaches are solidifying:

    1. Rely on your customs brokers: outsource this work to them.  Your brokers have the manpower and the know-how, and they are very likely to be selling programs to do this very thing.  You will give them the responsibility of coordinating with your origin operations and your suppliers, and collecting the additional data needed for an ISF, and you will also be granting them power of attorney to file the ISF with Customs on your behalf.  Downside is that you’ll pay for this service, and prices vary.  We’re hearing anywhere from $25 to $100 per ISF. 
     
    2. Use your origin forwarders or consolidators to do the work.  Probably a natural choice for many importers, especially importers in sectors like Retail where origin forwarding and consolidation services are heavily used.  Same drill as the option #1 except that your origin service providers are more familiar with the data sets and processes at origin.  And many have made advanced technology investments in this area, so capturing and standardizing data at origin may not be has human-intensive (and expensive) as it might be for brokers at the destination.  And that can give them a price edge. But not all importers rely on origin forwarders or consolidators.  And those that do rely on them in many cases rely on several, across regions, making a single outsource relationship decision difficult.
     
    3. Do it yourself.  This will be the choice for importers that have the staff and expertise to collect origin data and file ISFs directly, but it requires at least some technology to facilitate the ISF transaction.  Commercial solutions exist for this.  It will also be the choice for importers that have made more pervasive technology investments across their origin operations — for PO distribution and PO management with suppliers, for example.  For these importers, much if not all of the data required to meet the 10+2 regulatory requirements exists as a by-product of automating supply chain processes at origin.  And these importers are extending their technology investments to include direct ISF transaction capabilities.
     
    With January 26, 2010 fast approaching, every U.S. importer is going to have to take stock of what they’re capable of, and then pick the approach that suits them best.  One thing is certain:  the self assessment can no longer wait, and now , fortunately, there are three very clear ways to meet the 10+2 challenge.
     

    10+2 Update from the Field

    May 22, 2009

    American Shipper Magazine continues to do a good job covering the latest news related to the ISF rule. In the May issue they published a story titled: Struggling to make the grade on 10+2.

    Among the many topics covered in the story, here are some of the highlights:

    • So far, 54% of the filings are late
    • Filers are getting better, with more accurate data
    • Customs will show no mercy to shippers who don’t take advantage of the current grace period, once the rule goes into effect next Jan.
    • Rejection rate is currently about 6%
    • DHS will start providing filers with “report cards” to let them know how they are doing

    The headline here is get going, start filing something immediately.  Once the one year grace period ends, the pain really begins.


    Importers Still in 10+2 Denial??

    April 8, 2009

    I just came across a story written by in Eric Kulisch at American Shipper magazine that reported an alarming lack of compliance since the rule went effect on Jan 26. 

    The headline is that filings have been filed late about 70% of the time. But at least those that are filing are getting a sense of how the system works. The industry experts and the CBP are encouraging importers to start filing now. Anything is better than doing nothing.

    According to the article, Richard DiNucci, director of the Secure Freight Initiative at CBP said they will be less inclined to overlook filing errors by companies that failed to take advantage of the 12 month grace period. He went on to say, “If you come to me on Jan. 25, 2010 and you have made no attempt to file by then, there’s nothing for us to talk about”  – Yikes!


    How do you deal with 10+2?

    April 3, 2009

    While the government is still noodling around with the details, we can all assume that importers will be required to submit data to the government, early. From what we’re seeing in the market, there are three basic options to consider:

    1) Have your 3PL/Forwarder/Broker handle it – this makes sense for small and mid sized importers, especially those who deal exclusively with one provider. You may find some challenges in getting order and/or supplier data but the costs can be transactionalized and buried into fees you’re already paying the LSP.

    2) Get an ISF-specific technology solution. We refer to this as a “point solution” — a fairly low cost, straight forward 10+2 filing tool that can be used specifically for 10+2. This is also a good option for small and mid sized importers, however it will represent an ongoing cost center that can only be justified by fine/penalty avoidance.

    3) Get a broader technology solution that has an ISF module bundled in. This is how large and mid sized importers can address broader supply chain issues, beyond just 10+2. The very same data required for 10+2 can also be used to power visibility and document automation tools. In this case the value goes well beyond avoiding the wrath of DHS and into deep, strategic operational improvements.

    Overall, it’s important to think broad and long term. New regulations will continue to be added to the mix. The thing every importer (and exporter) needs to think of is “What is my global supply chain data strategy?”  Because once you have all of your data in a central location, you’ll be in position to deal with just about anything.


    10+2 Hits the Big Time!

    March 25, 2009

    Well, maybe.  But there is now a (pretty brief) Wikipedia entry.  Next stop:  YouTube.


    Twenty Questions (and answers)

    March 16, 2009

    There were a lot of questions asked at the recent 10+2 webinar, more than could be answered in the time allotted.  Our friend Beth Peterson took the time to answer all of them.  Here are the first twenty:

    ACE

    At some point will the ISF data be available on ACE?

    • The ISF data is not available in ACE at this time. It will be quite some time until ACE includes ISF data according to Lou Samenfink of CBP.

    AMENDMENTS

    Can you help us out with the timing of making amendments and by when must filers submit the updated data?

    • CBP has not specified how quickly the amendments must be made other than stating that amendments should be filed when the changed or more accurate data becomes available. The Importer Security Filing must be amended if there is a change or more accurate information becomes available before the goods enter the limits of a port in the United States. For goods that will be unladen in the United States, the Importer Security Filing must be updated if there is a change before the goods enter the port of discharge.

    Amend ISF for quantity? Why?

    • Beth misspoke, quantity is not required for ISF’s.

    AMS

    Are you filing your ISF prior to AMS filing?

    • For vessel carriers, that are not bulk or approved break-bulk, CBP must receive from the carrier the cargo declaration information in AMS 24 hours prior to the lading of cargo on the vessels, and for automated NVOCCs, the cargo declaration information merely needs to be transmitted 24-hours prior to lading of cargo. ISF is also required 24 hours prior to lading of the cargo but we’re anticipating that carriers will require the information even earlier.

    BILLS OF LADING

    When Customs implemented 10+2, I don’t recall anyone mentioning that a House or Master Bill of Lading would be needed to track the shipments. I’m assuming this is needed so Customs can tie the information together. Why wasn’t more emphasis placed on this? This really isn’t 10+2, it should be called 11+2….Is this information necessary?

    • You are correct that the bill of lading is needed to identify the shipments and to tie the ISF filing to the carrier status messages and stow plan. In addition to the bill of lading, you are also required to submit a filer code and a bond type so its really 13-2.

    What ties the importer’s 10 data elements to the carrier’s 2 data elements?

    • The lowest level House or Master bill of lading.

    Can you recommend the best way to coordinate or time the filing with the bill of lading submission from the carrier? I’m hearing that importers are finding it difficult to get their BOL from their ocean carrier early enough so they can file the ISF in a timely fashion. How are the carriers responding to this situation?

    • We’re hearing this too. According to CBP “The ISF Importer must obtain the bill of lading number. The bill of lading number is an integral part of the security filing. Without the bill of lading number, the ISF cannot be matched to a customs manifest.“ You are going to have to work with your carriers to get these numbers up front. You cannot use a “dummy” number and then replace it with the correct bill of lading number because the bill of lading number is the ISF identifier. You would have to submit a new ISF if you have a different number and this would probably be considered a late filing.

    (from the audience) Carriers are using booking numbers to convert to Bill of Lading numbers to make them available. This should become a standard.

    At what event is the B/L number created by the carrier?

    • It varies by carrier. You should work closely with your carrier to ensure that they are assigning the bill of lading number early enough for you to file the ISF 24 hours in advance of lading the goods on board the vessel at the foreign port of lading.

    Currently we were given advice to put “any number” in the Bill of Lading Number field that does not exceed 10 digits of course. When we receive our BL # then we can issue an amendment. 1) Are they capturing this issue in the 15% failure rate, and 2) Do you see this showing up on the report card, 3) This would clearly be a violation after 1/26/10? Finally, how are the carriers doing on compliance?

    • You cannot amend the bill of lading number on and ISF. You will be required to cancel the ISF with the incorrect number and resubmit. However you risk filing your ISF late in this case.
    • We do not believe that incorrect bill of lading numbers are resulting in ISF failures.
    • The report card includes a “Frequency of ISF-10 Filings by Number of Days Leading/Lagging Bill Filing Date” – but it’s not clear what this is actually measuring.

    Can you use your booking number as your BOL number for ISF?

    • Yes, if the booking number is the same as the bill of lading number.

    I’m confused about filing multiple b/l’s per ISF. Does this mean I can have multiple parties per ISF. Example if I have one b/l can I have multiple sellers and buyers. If I have multiple b/l’s can I have multiple buyers and sellers also?

    • A single ISF may cover multiple bills of lading as long as they are all going to the same importer as part of the same shipment on the same vessel voyage.

    For an importer that uses NVOs, is B/L concern the House or Master B/L?

    • It’s the lowest level bill of lading available.

    BONDS
    Does the shipper need a bond if their broker is filing as their Designated ISF10 filer?

    • CBP is postponing the requirement for bonds until January 26, 2010. At that time, the ISF filer may use the importer’s continuous bond or their agent’s bond. It’s important to determine who’s bond will be obligated as part of your Standard Operating Procedures and if you do utilize your agent’s bond, you will want to understand the costs to do so.

    Is there an additional bond required to what is already in place?

    • Not at this time. It isn’t very clear how CBP intends to implement the bond requirements and you should stay in touch with your surety company while this is being further defined.

    Is a separate bond required to file the ISF?

    • No, CBP is postponing the requirement for bonds until January 26, 2010. At that time, the ISF filer may use the importer’s continuous bond or their agent’s bond.

    BULK
    What if I ship bulk and my shipment ends up in a container with other shippers….if they are delayed due to ISF issues…will that delay my shipment too?

    • You are required to submit an ISF if your bulk goods are placed in a container. If your container includes other LCL importers, your goods could be held up due to items being imported by other parties included in the container that your goods are shipping in.

    Is this statement correct for break bulk? If the carrier you are using had applied for and received a break bulk exemption from the timing requirement for cargo declaration under 19CFR 4.7(b)(4)(ii), for ISF you can get an exemption from the 24 hour rule before lading and you can file the ISF 24 hrs before arrival in the USA. If the carrier does not already have the exemption in place you must file 24 hours before the vessel is loaded at the point of export.

    • Yes, break bulk has a timing exception – you can file your ISF for break bulk 24 hours in advance of arrival of the merchandise.

    BUYER

    For the “first sale” rule, does CBP want to see the “first sale” buyer (middle man) or the end buyer (consignee)?

    • It would be the buyer at the time of the ISF filing.   If the buyer changes during the sailing, an ISF amendment will need to be filed.

    CARRIER STATUS MESSAGES
    Are status messages being sent for all ISF filings?

    • Carrier status messages are required to be filed for every ISF. The carriers are subject to penalties if they fail to file status messages.

    CBP Representative
    How do we contact a CBP rep in our specific New York area?

    • We recommend that you start with your (or your broker’s) ABI/AMS representative, they have all be trained. Also, CBP has outreach events scheduled for March in New York.

    You can still hear the webinar

    March 3, 2009

    We recorded it.  You can find it here.  I think people found it useful; give it a listen and decide for yourself.

    There were over 100 questions asked; time limits prevented answering all of them during the course of the webinar, but I think we will try to get written answers to the rest and post them here.


    News item: Ahern takes over at CBP

    March 2, 2009

    From American Shipper:

    Jayson Ahern took over as acting commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection on Friday afternoon after Ralph Basham completed his final day on the job and headed into retirement.

    Mr. Basham had planned on retiring a few months earlier, but stayed on at the request of Janet Napolitano, the head of the Department of Homeland Security.

    So now you know about whom to mutter under your breath as you attempt to comply with 10+2 . . .


    Webinar tomorrow (just a reminder)

    February 25, 2009

    Also, the National Association of Manufacturers published a two-pager on the costs of 10+2; you can find it here. Well worth looking at.